الرد على أقدم وثيقة تثبت صلب المسيح

[د/ عبد الرحمن]

و كالمعتاد نجد الجهال يقرأون ما يريدون و يلونونه بالأزرق
بينما ما لا يريدون قراءته يتركونه بالأسود

فهم لونوا الكلام التالى بالأزرق

اقتباس Thiede posits a first-century date for P64 based primarily on his observation that some of the lettering is distinctly similar to that found in the Greek Minor Prophets Scroll 8HevXIIgr from Nahal Hever, which has been dated by various scholars between 50 b.c. and a.d. 50. He observed that several of the letters (α, ε, ι, ο, ρ) are identical or nearly identical, whereas others are distinctly dissimilar (η). However, the overall appearance of the lettering in 8HevXIIgr is earlier than that in P64/P67. By comparison, the lettering in P64/P67 is much more nearly identical to that of P. Oxy. 661 (as noted above) than to 8HevXIIgr. Thiede also notes similarities with the papyri in the ****** of Herculaneum (dated no later than a.d. 79) and the Greek Qumran fragment of Leviticus pap4QLXXLeva. The Herculaneum manu******s display an earlier form of calligraphy, and pap4QLXXLeva, though exhibiting similarities in many individual letters, is much earlier in its overall appearance (Roberts dated it to the late second century b.c.). Nevertheless, seeing similarities with earlier manu******s, Thiede suggests an earlier date for P64/P67: The prevailing tendency to date material of a nature comparable to Magdalen Gr. 17 to a period even preceding the earliest possible date of Matthew’s gospel suggests, with all due caution, the possibility of redating the fragments from Oxford and Barcelona—which are, after all, definitely Matthean—to a period somewhat earlier than the late second century previously assigned to them. Certainty will remain elusive, of course.18 In another publication, Thiede posits that the “earlier” date could be as early as the middle of the first century, even a pre–a.d. 66 date.19

و هو ما يفيد ترجيح أحد العلماء لأن الوثيقة ربما تعود لمنتصف القرن الأول ربما قبل سنة 66
و لكن الجهال تركوا الجملة التى تليها ملونة بالأسود

اقتباس But he offers no new or compelling paleographic evidence for this date.

الترجمة
و لكنه لا يقدم أى أدلة جديدة أو باليوجرافية تثبت هذا التاريخ

سبحان الله على تدليسهم !!!!!!

المزيد من مواضيعي

شبهة عورة الأمة و التفريق بينها و بين الحرة فى الحجاب

من و متى و ما سبب تحريف الكتاب المقدس من المصادر المسيحية

ردا على شبهة ( أنى يكون له ولد و لم تكن له صاحبة )

اتخذوا أحبارهم و رهبانهم أربابا من دون الله

البشارة بالبيت الحرام فى كتاب حياة آدم و حواء

هل حديث طول آدم عليه السلام خرافة ؟

الكتاب المقدس الخاص بأوريجانوس

الكتاب المقدس الخاص بالكنيسة الحبشية