Exposing Paul's Lies The Noble Quran on Paul and his likes: "Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:"This is from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:79)"
"Who can be more wicked than one who inventeth a lie against God, or saith, "I have received inspiration," when he hath received none, or (again) who saith, "I can reveal the like of what God hath revealed"? If thou couldst but see how the wicked (do fare) in the flood of confusion at death! - the angels stretch forth their hands, (saying),"Yield up your souls: this day shall ye receive your reward,- a penalty of shame, for that ye used to tell lies against God, and scornfully to reject of His signs!" (The Noble Quran, 6:93)"
GOD's stupidity is smarter than all of us?!
Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
The New Testament calls for the death of all Jews who reject Jesus as Christ. Jesus also abrogated "love" in Matthew 5 with "hate" in Matthew 7,15.
Simple yet devastating proof about Paul was NEVER inspired by the Holy Spirit! - Contradiction in divorce!
Paul literally allowed lying! The end literally justifies the means to him!
How can you say that the Bible has corruption in it when Saint Paul in 2 Timothy 3:16 clearly said that "All Scripture is God-breathed"?
Paul nullified and contradicted the point of Baptism. Him calling the disbelievers, who are supposed to be doomed to Hell, as "sanctified" and "holy" is clear nonsense and stupidity, and further proves with CLEAR-CUT proofs that his words were not Revelations from GOD Almighty. It also contradicts GOD Almighty's verdict about them in the Old Testament.
My rebuttal to Sam Shamoun's "Demonstrating how Paul's writings nullify Osama's desperate attempts to finding Bible Contradictions" article.
The Anti-Christ Paul. (By Abdullah Smith)
- Part II.
Paul the Corrupter. (By Abdullah Smith)
The Romantic Origins of Christianity. (By Abdullah Smith)
Paul v/s the Old Testament: 59 Contradictions. Paul Versus the Disciples.
Paul Contradicts himself.
The Problem with Paul.
Paul's Strange Law.
Paul’s idea of marriage.
The Jews did kill Jesus according to Paul.
PAUL, the self-appointed Prophet, was proven to be a deceiver who contradicted the teachings of Jesus and mocked the Law of Moses.
Are these Paul's words or GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations???? Disciples inviting each others to diner and deciding to "winter there".
Paulof Tarsus: The Clear-Cut Hypocrite
The Problem of Paul Regarding Esau
The Problem of Paul
Paul of Tarsus: The False Apostle According to Islam
'The Apocryphal Books of Elijah' & Paul
Epimenides Paradox: Was Paul "Inspired"?
Paul's Dependency on Talmudic Writings: Evidence of New Testament Borrowing
Paul and The 'Inspiration' of Scripture
The Influence of the Pauline Epistles Upon The Gospels of The New Testament: Study and Criticism
Famous Theologians and Historians believe that Paul was not truthful.
Is circumcision allowed or not allowed in the Bible? See the clear contradiction between Jesus and Paul.
Paul contradicted himself regarding the women's head covering.
Paul, Peter and John are in clear contradiction with each others regarding the disbelieving husbands to believing wives!
My response to Sam Shamoun's rebuttal to my article "Paul, Peter and John are in clear contradiction with each others regarding the disbelieving husbands to believing wives!".
The authors of the New Testament have conflicts (hostility) with each others. How about for Paul to punch Peter on the face?? That would've been "inspired", wouldn't it? The disciples fighting with each others!
Jesus (peace be upon him), Paul and the Christian Church.
What Did Paul Want To Know About Jesus?
Paul Broke The Covenant Of God.
Who's Gospel Is Paul Preaching?
Was Paul A Deceiver?
Rebuttal To Sam Shamoun’s Article “To Deceive Or Not To Deceive”.
Where Is This Promise Paul Is Referring To?
Why was Paul prosecuted?
Why is Paul still giving offerings?
Paul's View of Genealogies.
Does The Quran Affirm The Teachings Of Paul: Christian Missionary's Use Of Surah 61:14.
Examining Paul's Divorcement Law on Christian Women.
The Book of Romans:
Keep in mind that Paul himself admitted that he wasn't sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not. Please visit:
Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
Having said that, let us now see what the Bible theologians say about Paul's books:
"Although the introduction, which is rather lengthy, and the conclusion, which has a longer list of greetings than usual, identify this book as an epistle, the content as a whole does not have the occasional character or personal touch usually found in the Pauline letters. (The Amplified Bible, Page 1297)"
So it's quite possible and probable that the letter (book) of Romans was any of the following:
- Written by Paul and other people.
- Written by people other than Paul.
- Written by Paul and altered by others.
- Written by unknown people altogether.
"The writer of this letter was the apostle Paul (see 1:1). No voice from the early church was ever raised against his authorship. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1705)"
Ok, but notice how in this Book, we see the actual author himself, and in the ones above, we see nothing but conclusions. If GOD was the actual inspirer of all of these Books, then He wouldn't put us in the agony of making some conclusions to figure out His Words. Is GOD the author of confusion? Paul is also clear about his ownership of the Books of 1 Corinthians and 2 Corinthians.
But why must we take every single word that Paul spoke especially during his conversations with others as Words of GOD Almighty?!
Is Paul GOD Himself? No Christian believes in that. Paul fought with Saint Peter and accused him of being "clearly in the wrong" (Galatians: 2:11-12), and had a huge argument with Saint Barnabas (Acts 15:36-39).
Did GOD favor Paul over Barnabas and Peter and inspired him the words while he was fighting with them? I don't think so!.
Paul himself admitted before that he wasn't always inspired by GOD Almighty himself (1 Corinthians 7:25-30).
And since Paul never met Jesus in person (Acts 9:2-4. Note: Paul's name used to be Saul. Yet, Paul admittedly wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspirning him or not), and only claimed that Jesus came to him in person then there is always the possibility of him being untruthful. Since Paul never performed any miracles to help us believe his claim of Prophet hood, then his claim about him being GOD's apostle is just as good as me for instance claiming to be GOD's apostle.
Benny Hyne, one of today's famous Christian missionaries who have millions of fans world wide, claims and shows on TV how he could cure the paralyzed and makes him walk again. He claims that Jesus is inside him when he performs his so-called miracles. Why can't it be a bunch of liars that he paid and brought on TV, pretend to act paralyzed and pretend to act healed?
Paul could just as well be another Benny Hyne, except that Benny Hyne performed miracles (that are fake of course), but Paul never performed anything.
I hope you see how confusing the Bible really is. Its books are believed today from conclusions only as you've seen above, and it is only to be believed by blind faith. Blind faith is not the way to believe in GOD Almighty's Words, because GOD is not the author of confusion.
Please visit: Famous Theologians and Historians believe that Paul was not truthful.
Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture.
Paul, Peter and John are in clear contradiction with each others regarding the disbelieving husbands to believing wives!
What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe in?
The Books of 1 and 2 Corinthians:
"Scholars have noticed a lack of continuity in this document. For example the long section of 2, 14-7, 4 seems abruptly spliced into the narrative of a crisis and its resolution. Identical or similar topics, moreover, seem to be treated several times during the letter. Many judge, therefore, that this letter as it stands incorporates several briefer letters sent to Corinth over a certain span of time. If this is so, then Paul himself or, more likely, some other editor clearly took care to gather those letters together and impose some literary unity upon the collection, thus producing the document that has come down to us as the Second Letter to the Corinthians.(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1252)"
Again, we have no idea how many people wrote and edited the letters, and we don't know where and when this happened.
And again, Paul admitted that he wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not: Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
The Book of Philippians:
"The early church was unanimous in its testimony that Philippians was written by the apostle Paul (see 1:1). Internally the letter reveals the stamp of genuineness. The many personal references of the author fit what we know of Paul from other NT books. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1803)"
Again, it was assumed that this book was written by Paul himself. No one knows for sure whether it was Paul or somebody else. The New Testament wasn't even documented until 150-300 years after the disappearance of Jesus peace be upon him. If we're going to assume that Books that look appealing to us as the True Word of GOD Almighty, then we are committing a great crime against GOD Almighty and His Holy Words. No where in this Book we see a statement saying that it was inspired by GOD Almighty Himself.
And again, Paul admitted that he wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not: Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
The Book of Colossians:
"That Colossians is a genuine letter Paul is not usually disputed. In the early church, all who speak on the subject of authorship ascribe it to Paul. In the 19th century, however, some thought that the heresy refuted in ch. 2 was second-century Gnosticism. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1813)"
Again, it was assumed that Paul was the one who wrote the Book. But again, who's to say that it was inspired by GOD Almighty Himself?
And again, Paul admitted that he wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not: Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
The Books of 1 and 2 Thessalonians:
"Paul's authorship of 2 Thessalonians has been questioned more often than that of 1 Thessalonians, in spite of the fact that it has more support from early Christian writers. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1829)"
So basically we're not certain whether or not Paul wrote the Book. And even if Paul was the one who wrote it, we still don't know whether it was the True Words of GOD Almighty or not, because no where in the Book we see any indication that it was inspired by the Almighty GOD.